Skip to content

Positioning for cybersecurity startups

Position a cybersecurity startup against the tool, the platform feature or the manual review the buyer already uses. The person who pays is often a security leader who did not ask for another dashboard. Lead with the risk they own and the work you remove. Proof a buyer can check belongs beside the claim.

On this page
  1. The platform they already pay for is the comparison
  2. Steps
  3. What the buyer is asking
  4. A control report is proof, not a position
  5. FAQs

The platform they already pay for is the comparison

A security buyer may already pay a platform from a company such as Microsoft, CrowdStrike or Palo Alto Networks. Expect to be set next to a feature of that platform, a queue of alerts, or an outside firm. Dunford notes that features which were once unique become table stakes, and a position built on them weakens. The difference that lasts is a job the suite does not finish: a workflow, a data source or a depth of review that team does not staff.

Steps

  1. Name the review they do today

    The queue, the audit or the overnight check. One job.

  2. List the real alternative

    The platform feature, the manual review, the outside firm, or leaving the gap.

  3. Separate user and buyer

    An engineer may live in the product. A security leader may sign. Each needs a line.

  4. Say what you remove

    Alerts they stop chasing, a review they stop staffing, or a question they can answer for the audit.

  5. Show proof they can inspect

    A reference from a similar environment, how you fit the tools they run, and a control report if you have one.

What the buyer is asking

What they sayWhat they need
We already have a platformThe job that platform does not finish for this team
How are you differentOne capability the alternative lacks, and the result
Will this become the incidentWhat you do with their data, and what they can check
Can my team run itThe workflow inside tools they already open

A control report is proof, not a position

A SOC 2 report is an independent CPA examination of controls relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality or privacy, which is the AICPA’s description. Security approvers ask for it. It can support a trust claim. It does not explain the job, and you should not imply you have one when you do not.

FAQs

Should we claim we stop breaches?

Only with evidence a security buyer can check. An unsupported sentence is a claim they are trained to discount.

Do we name the incumbent platform?

In the positioning document, yes, when it shows up in deals. On the homepage, name it when buyers already use that comparison.

What if the platform ships our feature?

Expect it. Move the position to the customer, the data or the workflow they will not staff.

Sources

  1. April Dunford, A Product Positioning Exercise
  2. AICPA, SOC 2 examination of a service organization’s controls

Talk through your positioning in 15 minutes

Book a call